Politiquera tells a Texas campaign which precincts decide the race, which doors to knock, who has already voted — and on election night, what the count is doing while there is still time to act on it.
Or try the free map — no login →
Statewide coverage across all 254 Texas counties. Proven live through the 2026 cycle in Texas 15 — 11 counties, 288 precincts, read every minute of election night.
A public map of who has already cast a ballot. Search a name or an address, or watch turnout build across the Valley in real time as each county roster lands.
It is free, it needs no account, and it is the same data engine behind everything we sell.
Open the map →

Zoom in and the heat becomes households. Each one carries whether they voted, how, when it was reported, and what their public primary history suggests.
Texas does not register voters by party and the ballot is secret. We show the public record and an estimate from it — never a claim about how anybody voted.
Each phase stands on its own. Together they take a campaign from filing day to the moment the race is called.
Know where the race is before you spend a dollar.
Twelve days of knowing who has already voted.
The count as it lands, against your own targets.
Pick a precinct and every household on the walk list appears as a door — colour-coded by primary history, clustered until you zoom in, tappable for who lives there.
Export it as a mail file or print it as a map and hand it to a volunteer.


Every day of early voting measured against the last comparable election, so a campaign knows whether its turnout operation is working while it can still change something.
Counties publish on different clocks and some stamp no check-in date at all. We reconcile that and say plainly which days are solid.
Every county that publishes, read the minute it posts. Three independent sources, cross-checked against each other, with a verification gate that refuses to show a number that fails it.
A county reporting more votes than it has registered voters does not reach the screen. Two sources disagreeing about the split is reported, not hidden.


Your candidate's share of the votes cast and of the precinct's registration — two different questions, both answered. Plus how it is running against its own primary history, and how much vote is still out.

Election-night results come from the Secretary of State's own feed, which carries all 254 Texas counties and every contest on the ballot — 584 of them in 2026. Where a county publishes its own precinct file, we read that too and get there first.
The voter spine already holds 5.4 million records across all 254 counties, and 2.4 million ballots from the 2026 general. Adding a new district is loading the counties it covers — not building a new system.
A seat the other side had just redrawn in their own favour, held by an incumbent who won it by 14 points — flipped on a 38.8 point swing. Read the full story →
The campaign set a target share for every county. Here is how the night finished against them — over target in all eleven.
| County | Result | Target | vs target |
|---|---|---|---|
| San Patricio | 47.1% | 38% | +9.1 |
| Gonzales | 34.0% | 25% | +9.0 |
| Hidalgo | 74.4% | 67% | +7.4 |
| Jim Wells | 60.0% | 55% | +5.0 |
| Bee | 43.9% | 40% | +3.9 |
| DeWitt | 21.6% | 19% | +2.6 |
| Lavaca | 15.5% | 14% | +1.5 |
| Aransas | 26.4% | 25% | +1.4 |
| Goliad | 26.2% | 25% | +1.2 |
| Refugio | 35.9% | 35% | +0.9 |
| Brooks | 72.8% | 72% | +0.8 |
Unofficial results as reported on election night, 3 November 2026. Targets supplied by the campaign.
CD-15 is where this was proven, not the limit of it. The same capability runs for every one of Texas's 254 counties — eleven of them simply happened to be the ones in this district.
I built Politiquera because a candidate who wants to know what is happening in their own race should not have to go through three layers of consultants to find out.
The records are public. Who is registered, who voted, which precinct they live in, what they have done in past primaries — all of it sits there in county files, free for anyone to download. What did not exist was any way to actually read it. No analysis. No charts. No maps. No presentation. And nothing that let one piece of it speak to another.
So for the last ten years I did it by hand, for whoever asked. Hours of collecting, aggregating, sorting, normalising, formatting and finally displaying — until it came out the other side as something a person could look at and understand.
I have been around this in one form or another for twenty years, and politics runs in my family. It has always mattered to me. I treat an election the way other people treat the Super Bowl, and I have taken that same obsessiveness and pointed it at the data.
It is my way of contributing to democracy with the thing I am actually good at: taking dense technical analysis and making it reachable in the fewest clicks possible, so the person looking at it sees exactly what matters to them — whether that is the campaign manager, the data analyst, the field director running doors, or the candidate.
Every number on a board can be traced to the county file it came from. Where two sources disagree, we say so rather than picking one quietly.
A county reporting more votes than it has registered voters is held back and named, not displayed. Your candidate reads these numbers out loud.
The ballot is secret and Texas does not register voters by party. We report participation, which is public, and label every estimate as an estimate.
Politiquera reads the public record. VoterWiFi captures what happens in the room. Put the two together and a campaign stops guessing who showed up.
We will tell you what we can see in your district — which counties publish usable data and which do not — before you commit to anything.